Running Finnish Formative Assessment When You Still Have to Report Marks
Applied practice

Finnish formative assessment when you still have to report marks

This is the objection we hear most often, and it is a fair one. Finland assesses without ranking children. Your school has to publish marks, produce report cards and answer to parents who compare them. Both things can be true at once, and the resolution is more practical than it sounds.

The core distinction
  • Formative assessment is feedback during learning, aimed at the learner, to improve what happens next.
  • Summative assessment is a judgement at the end of a unit or year, aimed at reporting.
  • Finland does not abolish summative assessment. It shrinks it and keeps it out of daily teaching.
  • You can change the first without touching the second.
  • Most classroom time is formative. That is the ground you actually control.

What Finland actually does

It is widely believed that Finland has no assessment. It has less testing, which is not the same thing. Finnish teachers assess constantly, but the assessment is descriptive and directed at the child rather than at a ranking.

National high-stakes testing is essentially absent from basic education. National evaluation happens on a sample basis, is not tied to funding, and is not used to rank schools. Pupils do receive a school year report with grades, and national criteria exist for those grades in the later years, so the system is not gradeless. It is unranked, which is the meaningful difference.

The part you can change tomorrow

Your summative obligations are fixed: the unit tests, the terminal examinations, the report card format your certification requires. Leave them alone.

What is entirely within your control is the other ninety per cent of the year. In most classrooms, daily assessment is already a number: a mark out of ten on a worksheet, a red tick, a class position read aloud. None of that is required by anyone. It is habit.

Replacing it costs nothing and is the single highest-leverage change available. A child who is told "your reasoning in step two was strong, now check what happens when the number is larger" learns more than a child told "6/10", and the school's reporting obligations are entirely unaffected.

What to do about parents

Parents will ask, and they will ask quickly. The schools that manage this well share three habits.

They explain before they change. A short session at the start of the year, showing parents what descriptive feedback looks like next to a mark, prevents most of the anxiety.

They keep the summative reporting intact and say so. Parents worry that they are losing visibility. They are not: term reports continue exactly as before.

They show the work. A folder of a child's work with the teacher's written feedback across a term is more persuasive than any explanation, because parents can see the progression themselves.

A realistic sequence

Term one: stop marking daily classwork out of ten. Replace with two written comments: what worked, what to try next. Nothing else changes.

Term two: introduce structured peer and self-assessment in two subjects. Children learn the criteria by applying them.

Year two: move parent-teacher conversations from reading out marks to reviewing a portfolio of work against the objectives.

Throughout: summative assessment, examinations and report cards continue unchanged. Nobody loses any information they had before.

Finland did not remove assessment from its classrooms. It removed ranking from them, and kept the feedback.

Frequently asked questions

Does Finnish education really have no exams?

It has very few. There is no national high-stakes testing through basic education, and national evaluations are sample-based and not used to rank schools. Pupils still receive graded school year reports, and there is one national matriculation examination at the very end of upper secondary.

Can we adopt this while still publishing marks?

Yes. Formative and summative assessment are separate. You can change daily feedback completely while leaving examinations and report cards exactly as your certification requires.

Will this hurt exam results?

The evidence points the other way. Descriptive feedback during learning improves understanding, and understanding is what examinations ultimately test. The effect takes a year or two to show in results.

How do we handle parents who want to know their child's rank?

Explain the change before making it, keep summative reporting intact, and show parents actual work with feedback across a term. In practice, most parents who ask for a rank are asking whether their child is progressing, which descriptive feedback answers better.

Related reading

Find out if your school qualifies

OPPI affiliates a selective cohort of schools each year for its K-5 Finnish-pedagogy programme, backed by Education Finland. Tell us about your school and our team will come back to you with an honest read on fit.

Backed by Education Finland. Over 20 schools have already affiliated, including DPS, Radcliffe and Sanctus. Places in each cohort are limited.

Apply to the affiliation cohort →